Ingham County Circuit Court Decision on the Statewide
DataMaster
Program:
On February 18, 2010,
the Ingham County Circuit Court rendered an
important decision relative to the use of the BAC Datamaster and the
Michigan
State Police's BAC Datamaster Training Manual. The civil lawsuit,
entitled Sarah Belknap et al., v Peter Munoz, Director of the State
Police, and
the Department State Police, File No. 09-783-CZ, was originally
filed on
November 5, 2009 by attorney William Maze. The plaintiffs were 5 former
criminal
defendants in 5 different OWI cases who sought injunctive relief,
declaratory
relief, and a writ of mandamus against the Michigan State Police and MSP
Director Peter Munoz.
Plaintiffs asked the court to order MSP and its Director to stop all
alcohol
breath testing in the state because the BAC DataMaster device that is
currently
utilized is not an approved device and has not been formally adopted
under the
Administrative Procedures Act (APA). Plaintiffs challenged the
provisions in the
MSP's Michigan Breath Test Operator Training Manual that prohibited the
use of
portable radio transmitters in the area designated for breath alcohol
testing
and claimed that the APA required the manual be promulgated. The
Plaintiffs also
claimed that the MSP violated the Open Meeting Act when it made changes
to the
training manual. The Attorney General's (AG) Office represented the MSP
and its
director.
The AG's Office filed a Motion for Summary Disposition requesting the
Court
dismiss the case. On February 18, 2010, Ingham County Circuit
Court Judge
Paula Manderfield issued an opinion and order granting Defendant’s
motion for
summary disposition, and her order closed the case. In Judge
Manderfield’s
opinion and order, she stated “Plaintiff’s claims regarding the validity
of the
rules governing the use of the BAC Datamaster, as well as Plaintiffs’
claims
regarding the issue of whether the BAC Datamaster machine itself was
properly
promulgated, are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral
estoppel.